|
|
|
@@ -129,6 +129,10 @@ Gen 1 1:1 |
|
|
|
haplous: ~0.000225ms |
|
|
|
biblec: ~0.002346ms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exod 1 1:1 |
|
|
|
haplous: ~0.040692ms |
|
|
|
biblec: ~0.014129ms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rev 1 1:1 |
|
|
|
haplous: ~0.178406ms |
|
|
|
biblec: ~0.759610ms |
|
|
|
@@ -138,6 +142,6 @@ Both tests leaked no memory. |
|
|
|
As you can see, haplous is faster with `Gen 1 1:1`, since |
|
|
|
it didn't have to parse a 4kb index file before reading the first verse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the second test, BibleC is noticibly faster than Haplous. BibleC first |
|
|
|
Most of the time, BibleC is faster than Haplous. BibleC first |
|
|
|
calculates the verse line, then seeks to it. Haplous has to parse every |
|
|
|
line it reads. |
