Browse Source

second comparasion

master
Daniel 11 months ago
parent
commit
476a0cbaa4
1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
  1. +5
    -1
      formats.md

+ 5
- 1
formats.md View File

@@ -129,6 +129,10 @@ Gen 1 1:1
haplous: ~0.000225ms
biblec: ~0.002346ms

Exod 1 1:1
haplous: ~0.040692ms
biblec: ~0.014129ms

Rev 1 1:1
haplous: ~0.178406ms
biblec: ~0.759610ms
@@ -138,6 +142,6 @@ Both tests leaked no memory.
As you can see, haplous is faster with `Gen 1 1:1`, since
it didn't have to parse a 4kb index file before reading the first verse.

In the second test, BibleC is noticibly faster than Haplous. BibleC first
Most of the time, BibleC is faster than Haplous. BibleC first
calculates the verse line, then seeks to it. Haplous has to parse every
line it reads.

Loading…
Cancel
Save